Dragon Ball: Episode of Bardock

[PkMn Trainer]

My point remains valid and I never changed my position on it.  So I didn't concede anything.

Great, I lost Tye...

Good 'nough for me.

[Dragon in the Shadows]

   Not what I meant.  I meant Tye does not understand what I posted about the multiverse.

[PkMn Trainer]

inb4dragongoesanononfever

[Dragon in the Shadows]

  You forgot to use the space bar.

[PkMn Trainer]

On purpose, yes.

[Fever]

Science: It's  censored.gif Awesome!

I just don't get it.

[ArkticDark]

Do you realize how long it takes for a species to evolve?  Let alone evolve to the point of civilization?  That theory is just umbelievible.  The lengend of the Super Saiyans would have to exist for hundreds of thousands of years before Saiyans even existed.  Which is highly unlikely.

Okay, paradoxes do not exist.  In quantum theory there is a concept of the multiverse or multiple worlds theory (which has been tested in labs and proven even though the mechanics are still not fully understood).  Well, the multiverse deals with time paradoxes in this way.  The second you travel back in time you inaderventedly create a second copy of your history one where you do go back in time and one where you do not.  From that point on you constantly create new universes based on your actions.  Now things get kind of tricky.  Once you return to the present you may or may not return to your original universe or you may not have to return at all to see the benifits.

So in theory Freeza sends Bardoc back in time, Bardoc kills Chilled, no Freeza, Saiyans not killed by Freeza, Bardoc does not go back in time because the time travel occured to a different Bardoc.

There you go again...
It was never said that the Saiyans evolved on Plant Vegeta. They conquered it. Along time ago.

So maybe Bardock doesn't know where the Saiyansare currently living in the past.

And there you go again saying a Theory is proven. It is still a theory and no they have not proven it in lab so stop making sh!t up. If they proven the multiverse theory then provide a credit link saying they proved it. And in a lab common. We cannot time travel yet so there is no way to prove it. It is a Theory meaning an idea. An Idea!

You have no idea that another will be made if someone time travels you just have an idea that that might happen.

Theory isn't proven it is just a popular idea amongst scientist.

[/quote]

[Dragon in the Shadows]

That is because it has been proven.  Multiple times.  Ever hear of the double slit (tee-hee) experiment?  Besides LISA is going to be launched in the next three years and is expected to provide some data on new universes being created.

[ArkticDark]

Its not the multiverse law it is a theory. Not proven. They just speak convincingly but they aren't stating fact.

They have no results really just calculations. Not proven.

They will be very lucky LISA finds anything.

[Dragon in the Shadows]

Nice job avoiding the question I asked.  But they have indeed found results.

[ArkticDark]

I might have heard something about that.

Have you ever heard of wave partical duality
 
I believe it was devised from the double slit experiment and it is a Paradox in itself.

[Dragon in the Shadows]

The most recent version of the double slit experiment is what I'm talking about.  Only one photon of light passes through one slit for a given time.  Producing this:



Since only single photons are used there is no wave interference, yet something is affecting where the photons strike the plate otherwise they would land in roughly the same area.  Thus the interference must be coming from photons from another universe.

[ArkticDark]

wow so they and you just jump to the broad conclusion that it has to be from another universe just because they don't know why and have no proof???

[PkMn Trainer]

What the F*CK is going on here?! >

[ArkticDark]

What?

[PkMn Trainer]

You two and your arguments creating some big-ass sh*t of science.

[Dragon in the Shadows]

To be completely honest, I got tired of Arktic's ignorance on physics beyond gravity pulls down on my last post.  I'm done.  And particle interference when there are no other particle to interfere, I'ld say that is proof.

[ArkticDark]

Ignorance? It's not proof, It's just unexplained.

Because we cannot observe other Universes they are not proven. So just because they cannot explain the particle interference doesn't mean you can just guess it is due to alternate Universes because you cannotprove that said alternate Universe even exists.

I actually like these debates Dragon, they are fun.

Dude, every website I visit about the Multiverse theory and every tv special I watch about it says it is all HYPOTHETICAL!

So please post me a link to a realiable site saying that The Multiverse Theory is proven fact and we have actually observed a parallel Universe in science.
Dude If you don't do this then you need to retract your statement about me being ignorant because I ain't trying to get rude man, It's a fun debate that I have enjoyed alot up until this point.

[Fever]

What the F*CK is going on here?! >

You two and your arguments creating some big-ass sh*t of science.

Lol. 

[BigStinkinApe]

I'm just saying there is a huge plot hole.

do like DBZ has always done and "FIND OUT NEXT TIME ON DRAGON-BALL Z! *que outro*


spin off seems epic, graphics are at a similar level to oone of the budokai openings, #3 if I am not mistaken.

[PkMn Trainer]

"Graphics" makes it sound like CGI.  It does look like Budokai 3's animation.

[ArkticDark]

Yea it is very cool.

I wonder if they will remake all of DBZ with this look. Basically a redrawn reboot.