Planter Turbo World

[ArkticDark]

This is a Turbo variation of Dark World that doesn't use Reckless Greed. It instead uses Magic Planter and a hefty amount of Continuous Traps. This deck utilizes Forced requisition with other Dark World support to keep the opponent's hand low and allowing a safer use of Dark Scheme. This is the Theory.

Monsters: 17
Grapha x3
Snoww x3
Broww x3
Beiige x2
Sillva x1
Goldd x1
Trance Archfiend x3
Grand Mole

Spells: 13
Magic Planter x3
The Gates of Dark World x3
Dark World Dealings x3
Dragged Down to the Grave x3
Card Destruction

Traps: 10
Dark Smaog x2
Skill Drain x2
Forced Requisition x2
Dark Scheme x2
Fiendish Chain x2 / or 1 with 1 CotH or 2 CotH


So this is the Theory and what I am working off of. Of course it is lacking defensive but it is the style of this type of deck. Testing will start soon.

[BigStinkinApe]

I'd drop dark scheme's and one of the lords of DW for 2-3 safezone and 0-1 COTH/ deapth amulet.

[Fever]

Why run only one of each Goldd and Sillva but two Beiige?

[BigStinkinApe]

You can summon beiige and bounce it to SS grepha, and not need a discard outlet, and it's a 1900 who normally does not suck, but also does not matter for DW to use.

[Fever]

I run three anyway but I'm just saying for his deck. If you don't have access to Grapha then he's fuct.

[PkMn Trainer]

^ Wait wat OK you seriously don't need 3 Beiige (2 surely means a sufficient # of low lv. DW) unless it really helps bring out Maestroke the Symphony Djinn.
___

Yup like BSA said, Dark Schemes out.  You do have enough discard outlets, and better ones at that.

The problem here is the lack of S/T destruction besides Grapha.  I think you'll have to trade a DWD & Drag for 2 DWL to help make up for it.  This'll hurt Forced Requisition though... You will have to make up for the loss in Continuous Trap if you do this.

Definitely keep 2 Fiendish Chains.

[ArkticDark]

I was wondering if I could get you guys to play this deck on DN just like I built it. Maybe just a few times. Just to help me test it in this form before I go changing things. I would like a few live opinions of this exact build from experience. Please if you don't mind.

[Fever]

Trainer it is necessary for my deck. You don't care for Beiige because of your control builds. I love it. But since this is Arktic's deck, the choice is his.

[PkMn Trainer]

Unless you're pushing for Rank 4's, the spot for a third Beiige could be somethin' better.  Like Mole.

2's OK though.

[ArkticDark]

Snoww and Trance Archfiend are potentially 2000 beaters. But it isn't that hard to get Grapha because you got Foolish and 3 Graphas and 3 Snoww so that is 7 possible ways to get Grapha.

So really many Lords aren't needed for power cards when I already have 7 outlets to have a Grapha and then you can just keep using the same one over and over.

[Fever]

Unless you're pushing for Rank 4's, the spot for a third Beiige could be somethin' better.  Like Mole.

2's OK though.

That's fine.

Snoww and Trance Archfiend are potentially 2000 beaters. But it isn't that hard to get Grapha because you got Foolish and 3 Graphas and 3 Snoww so that is 7 possible ways to get Grapha.

So really many Lords aren't needed for power cards when I already have 7 outlets to have a Grapha and then you can just keep using the same one over and over.

That's your choice. I'm just saying in my testing, I have found that I win a lot of games because I run a lot of Lords and Monsters in general. I survive Torrentials and most importantly mirror matches. When you opponent uses discard effects, who is gonna have the advantage? The person with more Dark World Monsters or less? That's why I don't change my formula because it works. Even if nobody on here believes that, I will still use what works.

[PkMn Trainer]

More Lords can work.

[ArkticDark]

hmm... What about dead hands of high level monsters that you cannot discard because MST is at 3 and your Gates are getting blown up?

It is just kinda risky to carry more high level monsters... A bit...

If my opponent makes me discard Snoww or Grapha it will be awesome. And I gotz some Lords.

I got 5 high level monsters in my deck Fever, and remember back before the structure? When we were running 5 Lords because 6 were too many? So now we got Grapha and I will continue to run 5 high level DW monsters. See?

[PkMn Trainer]

With Trance Archfiend I suppose supporting more Lords works.  It's not a flat out bad idea anymore.  I don't choose to because you can do without it in general match-ups (other cards can be more suitable).  More power definitely helps in mirror matches, but my focus is on what's big right now.

[ArkticDark]

I guess with DW winning recently it will be more present in meta again.

[PkMn Trainer]

A little, but I'm sure there's a temporary spark in interest.  When DW tops, it's only one guy.  This time DW happened to win.  People on Dino Rabbits will stay on Dino Rabbits lol.

[Fever]

I run more Lords because:

1) Dark World Lightning
2) Gates
3) Trance Archfiend

If I ran 3 MST then my deck would be inconsistent. With all my Monsters drawing that when I need Dark World Dealings or something else is a killer. But it's all smooth now.

[ArkticDark]

grapha and Trance put a DW monster back in your hand for discarding too tho.